[pmwiki-users] Re: Re: Blog proposal
sven saurwein
saurwein at komit.at
Thu Dec 15 14:53:59 CST 2005
Waylan Limberg wrote:
> On 12/15/05, sven saurwein <saurwein at komit.at> wrote:
>
>>(*)
>>so I tend towards making a title mandatory and in any case merge
>>creation date AND title for the pagename, maybe stripping the title to
>>first, say, 6 words:
>>www.pmwiki.org/Blog/20051215=TheyForcedMeToFillTitle
>>www.pmwiki.org/Blog/20051215=INamedThisPageSue
>>
>
> If you want to configure yours to work that way fine. Just don't make
> me do mine that way. I like the flexability to do as I please. I
> realize that in some cases flexability can be a bad thing - but in
> other's its not. As long as a site admin can configure PmWiki to be as
> flexable or inflexable as that site needs, I'm all for it. Just don't
> expect others (me) to like your less flexable approach. I'll configure
> mine my way. Thank you.
the difference right now between normal wiki pages and blog pages is the
that one of them will be automaticcaaly added to a trail.
I also respect and sure support that creating a new blog entry should be
as easy possible.
but I dont see why a blog page shouldnt be given a proper pagename, as
any other wiki page must.
Isn't the name of the page one basic feature of the wikiwikiweb, by
which it can be easily and meaningful linked?
I dont see why a wiki page marked (:blog:) couldnt someday just rest in
the usual wiki djungle, and it will maybe do so with an , sry, ugly
pagename like 2005121503.
sven
-----
More information about the pmwiki-users
mailing list