[pmwiki-users] nesting divs and tables

[Chris Cox]

Andrew Standfield wrote:
> Less verbose. More generic. More like XHTML, so more familiar to the  
> majority of people who will even use it (I'd guess).

???

(:div2:)
(:div2end:)

Looks pmwiki-ish...

What the heck is:

(:div/:)
(:/div:)

???

I'm afraid I'll counter that your example
is the one that seems bizarre.

> 
> 
> Andy Standfield
> http://www.vertigo25.com/
> http://www.ipodnirvana.com/
> 
> 
> On Aug 7, 2006, at 10:59 AM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> 
>>On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 09:58:12AM -0700, Andrew Standfield wrote:
>>>Wouldn't an easier solution be to create a more direct mark up that
>>>would not have the auto-completion associated with current markup.
>>>Something like (:div/:) would crate an opening <div> and would need
>>>to be completed with a (:/div:) (creating the </div>).
>>How is this any different from saying that a (:div2:) is to
>>be completed with a (:div2end:)?
>>
>>Pm
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pmwiki-users mailing list
> pmwiki-users at pmichaud.com
> http://host.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
>